![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
transmitters v senders
Seems like I should just stick with the current stuff and connect it to JPI, similar to what you did in the 210.
JPI is asking me if my current senders are resistance or capacitance....I looked through the SM and it talks about the fact that T337C uses fuel transmitters, then later years use senders. also unique to T337C is the fact that it uses one gauge per side, and you determine whether you want to see main or aux on it by the microswitch in overhead. so, not quite sure yet how to answer JPI, and also how this thing really gets connected. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I looked through through my manual but it doesn't go back to a t337c. By the wiring prints yours should have resistive type probes.
Kim |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
65-73 CM 337 and T337 (like the T337C)
here is a link to the Sm that covers the T337C. Mine is s/n 337-0775
https://agsi.sharefile.com/d-sd5e1882ac4c4e6da I believe the fuel system for my plane is referenced on pg 675 676 looks like the pennycap system came later? in looking at those two pages (and maybe I am looking at the wrong pages) it talks about a unit and gives a part number for the tank unit...but it doesn't say if it is resistance or capacitance...the really fun part when you read through section 11 on fuel system, it talks about how the 337c and t337c got a different fuel gauage system and used transmitters versus senders, than years before or after....yay |