Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 03-08-24, 11:17 AM
n86121's Avatar
n86121 n86121 is offline
bigcheese
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Potomac Airfield~!
Posts: 323
n86121 is on a distinguished road
From my excruciating review of TCM manuals,
interlaced into T337D performance charts...

75% ROP will give around 150knots IAS @ 13.3gph (ea) x2 = 26.5 gph
65% LOP will give around 140knots IAS @ 10.3gph (ea) x2 = 20.6 gph

In the turbo, (non-pressurized) TAS increases linearly @10 knots/5k ft

Until you hit 25k (critical altitude), when engine poer starts to dropoff
I've never taken it that high, that's a looooong way down if you want to stop!

So for example, at 10k ft

TAS 75%= 150+10x2=170k @ ROP = 26.5.3gph = 6.4 kn/gal
TAS 65%= 140+10x2=160k @ LOP = 20.6gph = 7.7 kn/gal

= 20% more range/gal = 6% reduction in TAS speed.

=====

Applied to my theoretical 1400 kn trip (each way) from Wash DC to Denver and back... 2800 miles total...

75% = 2800/170k = 16.5 hrs @ 26.5 = 440 gals
65% = 2800i/160k = 17.5 hrs @10.3 gph (ea) =360 gals

For ~80 gals extra (roundtrip ~$500?) ...I can cut the round trip time by just ~1 hours...?

Questions become,

1) Am I willing to pay $500 to get an hour of my time back? ...nah, I'll just enjoy the cruise for another hour

2) If the airplane costs $200/hour (??), one less hour reduces the extra fuel cost by $200....

CONCLUDE => It does seem to suggest LOP at 65% and enjoy the extra hour of flight time...

Thoughts?
__________________
David Wartofsky
Potomac Airfield
10300 Glen Way
Fort Washington, MD 20744

Last edited by n86121 : 03-08-24 at 11:31 AM. Reason: errors
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 03-08-24, 12:21 PM
edasmus edasmus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ARR - Aurora, IL - USA
Posts: 420
edasmus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to edasmus
"Excruciating".... YEP

You have summed it up! In my senior years, I've reduced the story to a much shorter version.

Higher POWER = Higher SPEED = Less TIME = More $$$ (In FUEL and probably MAINT.)

Lower POWER = Lower SPEED = More TIME = Less $$$ (In FUEL and probably MAINT.)


It's not black and white however in my opinion. There are infinite shades of gray and countless variables go into the longevity (or lack there of) of our engines. Heck, many variables we cannot even control. We simply do the best we can and continue learning all the time. It's part of the fun I suppose.

Enjoy your flight. Bring a pee bottle. I'd hate for you to have to heat up your engines just to make it to the little "pilot's" room. ;o)
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.