Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 01-02-03, 06:34 PM
Eustacio-Chachi Eustacio-Chachi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Panama Rep. of Panama
Posts: 59
Eustacio-Chachi is an unknown quantity at this point
How about power after rotation?

On a previous post I have seen a discussion on landing gear retraction after take off. It would be interesting to see the take off "check list"after rotation for those with comments on the landing gear retraction. I would say that on power reduction is when probabilities of an engine failure increase.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 01-02-03, 08:18 PM
Jerry De Santis's Avatar
Jerry De Santis Jerry De Santis is offline
TAS (Thin Air Seeker)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Battle Creek, Mi
Posts: 457
Jerry De Santis is on a distinguished road
Talking Power Reduction

Hi Chachi!

I follow the following:

1, 500 feet or greater in elevation
2, Speed well past blue line (general around 120 MPH)
3, Wheels up and flaps up.

Only after the above do I reduce power to climb settings.

On the personal side:
I'll be in Panama on the evening of January 20th and will go to job site Tuesday morning. Should be done on Wednesday night and back in Panama City. Free day on Thursday with flight back home Friday. See ya in Panama
Cheers
Jerry
N34EC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 01-02-03, 09:21 PM
kevin kevin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hillsboro, OR (HIO)
Posts: 843
kevin is on a distinguished road
I do the same as Jerry, except I wait a bit longer. I wait until 1000' AGL before reducing power.

kevin
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 01-03-03, 08:39 AM
Eustacio-Chachi Eustacio-Chachi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Panama Rep. of Panama
Posts: 59
Eustacio-Chachi is an unknown quantity at this point
Jerry, confirm you have received the message I send to your personal mail
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 01-03-03, 05:12 PM
rick bell rick bell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 15 mi south san felipe, mx
Posts: 265
rick bell is an unknown quantity at this point
does anybody just run up to the top of green for takeoff? i do except at my house where there is 1600' useable and obstructions. seems to work fine, any comments + or -
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 01-03-03, 06:24 PM
kevin kevin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hillsboro, OR (HIO)
Posts: 843
kevin is on a distinguished road
Rick,

I am told that partial throttle takeoffs are actually less beneficial to the engines than full. The reason is that in the last part of the throttle travel, the mixture is enriched. So if you run full throttle, the engine is getting a richer mixture than partial. BUT...

If you are going to climb for 10 minutes at "the top of the green", and if you have enough runway, I myself don't see why it hurts. The engine does not know it is the first minute of takeoff vs the other 10. Unless you count the very brief period of reduced airflow during the takeoff roll.

In the end, I always do full throttle takeoffs because I don't believe it *reduces* engine wear to do partial throttle takeoffs, and I want to be at 1000' AGL as quickly as possible, to give me altitude to deal with an engine failure.

My 2 cents.

Kevin
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 01-03-03, 06:46 PM
Jerry De Santis's Avatar
Jerry De Santis Jerry De Santis is offline
TAS (Thin Air Seeker)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Battle Creek, Mi
Posts: 457
Jerry De Santis is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up Power on take off

Rick, The reason I use full power on take off is for safety purposes. If I rotate and climb a few hundred feet and lose an engine with no more runway left to land on, I want all the power I can get with the live engine to continue the climb. A second or two delay can make a difference in the initial climb rate since you will be closer to blue line without full power.

Jerry
N34EC
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 01-07-03, 06:36 PM
Jim Rainer's Avatar
Jim Rainer Jim Rainer is offline
Jim Rainer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 163
Jim Rainer is an unknown quantity at this point
Takeoff power

I have a 1976 337G normally aspiritated and always use full power for takeoff. The engine is designed so that if the throttles are firewalled, there is a richer mixture than when they are pulled back. You can see this by just pulling your throttles back an inch and watch the egt rise. Consequently, you are robbing your engines of much needed cooling fuel at the exact time they need it the most.

There's wonderful article article on Avweb by John Deakin about just this subject. For those of you not familiar, Avweb is a great aviation site that publishes two email letters per week full of all kinds of stuff. It's at www.avweb.com.

The website for the article is www.avweb.com/articles/pelperch/pelp0063.html -- if I typed this wrong, just go to the Avweb site and poke around until you find Deakin under "article" or "writers. Very informative especially for turbocharged engines.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 01-09-03, 09:17 AM
Jim Rainer's Avatar
Jim Rainer Jim Rainer is offline
Jim Rainer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 163
Jim Rainer is an unknown quantity at this point
Take-off power

Eustachio, I'm replying to my own reply because the link for Deakin's article does not seem to work. Here's how to access it: go to www.avweb.com - then in the "search" blank enter "pelican's perch" and hit enter - then download items 3 and 5 by Deakin about engine power. The one refered to above is number 5 and I have yet to read number 3 but 5 relates to takeoff power.

I just re-read 5 and it is an excellent article and well worth reading. Deakin is a proponent of LOP operation with GAMI injectors - which is controversial - but this articles gives one the option of either ROP or LOP. Lots of really good information here!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 01-10-03, 02:38 AM
Kevin McDole Kevin McDole is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 138
Kevin McDole is an unknown quantity at this point
Here are the two Deakin articles that Jim is referring to:

Part 1: http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182179-1.html
Part 2: http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182176-1.html
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Unread 01-10-03, 07:02 AM
Bob Cook Bob Cook is offline
N69S
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: CYYZ,MYAT
Posts: 561
Bob Cook is an unknown quantity at this point
METO

I agree with Jim.

You need full power for;
1) double check fuel flow (check manual) mine is 140 lbs/hr.
2) provide sufficient fuel cooling. - yes you waste fuel.
3) avoid preignition "knock"
4) insure engines are developing power.
5) insure the engine is still developing pwr at V1
6) feels good <G>

Should stay that way until;
1)temp limits reached
2)safe altitude
3)obstruction clearance
or
4)you migrate into cruise climb. (generally ~1k ft .

most important you have a *reference* for fuel flow / cht/ egt on the roll (more important with turbos).

bob
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 01-14-03, 01:29 PM
Guy Paris's Avatar
Guy Paris Guy Paris is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashua NH. (near ASH)
Posts: 266
Guy Paris is an unknown quantity at this point
Cool I reach over....

and squeeze them props back a scoch. Get them RPMs down a bit.... Guy, old72driver....
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.