Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Unread 09-22-20, 06:59 PM
DrDave DrDave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 115
DrDave is on a distinguished road
I believe the C system is the same as the A and B and D. There is no paralleling function of those regulators. Please refer to the charging system diagram. There are two separate regulators that operate one at a time. You can easily confirm this by identifying the regulator 1,2 switch. Just because they screwed two regulators to the firewall doesn't mean it uses both of them at the same time.

In this system it has two alternators charging one battery. The two alternators are controlled by one regulator. As an aside, there are two-and-a-half ways to run this system; regulator 1, regulator 2, run/standby switch with each regulator. I give half-credit for that since in the standby mode it bypasses the contactor, alt field breaker, and master switch. The standby circuit goes to the battery terminal of the OVR. Cool system. I see no reason to change the architecture of the system.

Now back to your original question, I would put in one Zeftronics R25102A. This will charge the system around 28.4V with a healthy field circuit. This model is approved for your airplane. You don't have to live with that low 27.4V system. Your battery will thank you.

Report your results. As always I would be glad to help.

Dave

Last edited by DrDave : 09-22-20 at 07:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.