Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 10-22-13, 06:07 PM
YankeeClipper's Avatar
YankeeClipper YankeeClipper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 262
YankeeClipper is on a distinguished road
Glide Chart

By any chance does the POH cite a glide chart for both engines out?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 10-22-13, 06:16 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,261
hharney is on a distinguished road
Like this
see photo attached
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	photo.PNG
Views:	1950
Size:	410.0 KB
ID:	1494  
__________________
Herb R Harney
1968 337C

Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 10-22-13, 06:40 PM
YankeeClipper's Avatar
YankeeClipper YankeeClipper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 262
YankeeClipper is on a distinguished road
13.2 ratio? Really?

Thanks, btw.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 10-26-13, 11:27 AM
YankeeClipper's Avatar
YankeeClipper YankeeClipper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 262
YankeeClipper is on a distinguished road
Not to belabor the point, but is 13.2 really even roughly correct? This would well exceed the same data for an M20F, and approach mid-to-late century gliders. Given the recent tail of a near double engine failure, this would be good information to have. I understand of course that weight and exterior contour changes can play a large role in the final outcome.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 10-27-13, 05:12 PM
JeffAxel JeffAxel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 150
JeffAxel is an unknown quantity at this point
part of the reason twins have a relatively good glide ratio is that the charts assume both props are feathered, which reduces drag considerably.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 10-31-13, 07:51 AM
YankeeClipper's Avatar
YankeeClipper YankeeClipper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 262
YankeeClipper is on a distinguished road
But the M20s also feather, and they only advertise something around 11ish. Add to this, fwiw, that the Mooneys earn their living by being just a little more slippery than other aircraft in their class.

Could it be that the small twin booms are that much less drag than a full empennage?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 11-13-13, 11:44 AM
WebMaster's Avatar
WebMaster WebMaster is offline
Web Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,524
WebMaster is on a distinguished road
Mooney

Mooney's are advertised as a little more slippery, but they also have much higher wing loadings, hence lower glide ratios
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 11-13-13, 02:56 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,261
hharney is on a distinguished road
FWIW
Here is the Pressurized H model glide distance
Attached Files
File Type: pdf SCAN65.pdf (87.8 KB, 1625 views)
__________________
Herb R Harney
1968 337C

Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 11-13-13, 10:12 PM
Guy Paris's Avatar
Guy Paris Guy Paris is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashua NH. (near ASH)
Posts: 266
Guy Paris is an unknown quantity at this point
(2) engine out glide ratio

Hi All,

Here is the chart from my 1977 337 G.

Guy Paris.... the old 72 driver....
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	N1312L  (2) engines out 001.jpg
Views:	1582
Size:	517.3 KB
ID:	1502  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.