Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 08-10-03, 06:52 PM
hewilson hewilson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Monterey, Ca. (MRY)
Posts: 91
hewilson is an unknown quantity at this point
Low time insurance

Tom,

Spoke to Steve Neely who suggested I get a conventional twin rating which seems unnecessary to me. Did you get a conventional ME rating? If you don't get a conventional ME, what is entailed for a CLT? Did you get that in your 0-2? Thanks for taking the time to instruct me!

Hugh
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 08-14-03, 03:48 PM
OSCARDEUCE OSCARDEUCE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 78
OSCARDEUCE is an unknown quantity at this point
Hugh,
I have a multi rating with CLT limitaion. I hope to remove the CLT soon so I can fly a B-25!!!!. Took all training and checkride in the O2-A
The check flight was similar to a conventional twin, we did engine out, prop feathering and simulated single engine appraoches. Only critical engine and Vmc was not covered as that is not an issue for us.
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 08-15-03, 06:30 AM
Jerry De Santis's Avatar
Jerry De Santis Jerry De Santis is offline
TAS (Thin Air Seeker)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Battle Creek, Mi
Posts: 457
Jerry De Santis is on a distinguished road
CLT Rating

If your intention is to always fly CLT aircraft, the CLT rating is okay. The problem with only a CLT rating is, if in the future you decide to fly conventional twins, the insurance company will not recognize CLT as multi time and thus you have no multi experience.

It works this way. With a conventional twin rating, when you fly a Skymaster, you get to log the time as multi experience. However, if you have only a CLT rating, you must log time as CLT not multi. Yes! I know it does not seems right, but that's the way it is.

So what you have to do is think about what you want to fly in the future -------insurance wise.

Cheers
Jerry
N34EC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 08-16-03, 03:19 AM
Kevin McDole Kevin McDole is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 138
Kevin McDole is an unknown quantity at this point
The twin rating is not hard to get - it only takes something like 12 hours. I'm not sure how much of that you actually cut out by going for the CLT only rating.

Even if you plan to fly only CLT, you'll appreciate it much more having learned in a conventional twin.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 08-16-03, 08:41 PM
WebMaster's Avatar
WebMaster WebMaster is offline
Web Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,524
WebMaster is on a distinguished road
I agree

I agree with Kevin, you'll never appreciate how much safer a 337 is until you feather an engine on a SBS twin.

As Jerry said, there are advantages if you want to fly something else later. The time and effort to get a SBS rating is not significantly more than a CLT rating.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 08-18-03, 06:13 PM
OSCARDEUCE OSCARDEUCE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 78
OSCARDEUCE is an unknown quantity at this point
I had to think with my wallet. Why pay for an airplane and then rent someone elses, esp. with an hour limitation from insurance. I have 60 hours in the O2 now and I hope to put some money back to get the CLT limitation removed
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 08-22-03, 04:00 PM
Ron Ball Ron Ball is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 24
Ron Ball is an unknown quantity at this point
Hugh please see my post under 337 high performance single....
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.