Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 03-04-12, 12:28 PM
Ernie Martin's Avatar
Ernie Martin Ernie Martin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 989
Ernie Martin is an unknown quantity at this point
Here is one source: www.mypilotstore.com/mypilotstore/sep/1177

It's easy to calibrate. I have the FuelHawk shown in the link; the calibration for my 337G with extended range tanks is shown below :

Mark Gallons (Usable)
0 31.8
1 37.8
2 42.7
3 46.1
4 49.4
5 52.5
6 54.8
7 57.0

Ernie
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 03-04-12, 02:14 PM
Gord Tessier's Avatar
Gord Tessier Gord Tessier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CYSN
Posts: 94
Gord Tessier is an unknown quantity at this point
Hi Ernie, isn't the 1973 337G 59 gallons useful. Your gauge tops at 57?
Just wondering.
Gord
__________________
Gord
C-FTES
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 03-04-12, 02:53 PM
Ernie Martin's Avatar
Ernie Martin Ernie Martin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 989
Ernie Martin is an unknown quantity at this point
Seven is the highest wet marker. Completely full (59) is at a line somewhere between 7 and 8.

Ernie
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 03-04-12, 08:46 PM
Gord Tessier's Avatar
Gord Tessier Gord Tessier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CYSN
Posts: 94
Gord Tessier is an unknown quantity at this point
Ahhh, ok now I get it. I just ordered one. I was always filling the tanks and relying on the Shadin to tell me how much fuel I had left. I never felt really comfortable doing that.
Thanks Ernie.
Gord
__________________
Gord
C-FTES
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 03-07-12, 09:26 AM
jchronic jchronic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mass
Posts: 100
jchronic is on a distinguished road
Being highly fuel-conscious on our extended overwater surveys, I agree with the kudo to the Shadin. Over time, with a visual verification of full tanks on departure, and careful tracking of fuel adds after landing (I keep a running spread sheet), I've found it to be consistently accurate within 1-2 gallons. I try to maintain my fuel gauges, but just as a 'sanity check against' the Shadin and time flown/fuel burn - and in case of a leak somewhere that doesn't register on the Shadin sensors.

At our usual (low) altitudes and distance offshore I can't risk waiting for an engine to stumble before switching tanks. So when using the aux tanks, I burn the mains for 1 hour, then switch one engine to aux at a 'cardinal' time (e.g. on the hour or at 15, 30, or 45 mins after) and note the time on my kneeboard. Then 15 mins later, switch the other engine to aux, burning both aux tanks exactly 1 hour.

Since our survey cruise is 100 knots, there's aux fuel left at the end of an hour. If I need to use it, I go back to each aux tank - one at a time - for another 15 minutes. Again, at a higher altitude I'd wait for the fuel flow to start dancing around, but not where we are.

Joe
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 03-10-12, 02:54 PM
n86121's Avatar
n86121 n86121 is offline
bigcheese
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Potomac Airfield~!
Posts: 323
n86121 is on a distinguished road
Fuel Management

I use the mains until there is abouot 30 min to 1 hour left - 16 gals.
I have a shadin set to warn me "low fuel" to switch to aux at 76 gals used from mains.
That assures me fuel in the mains for landing.

Then I switch to aux.

When there are about 4 gals left in each aux, i.e. 30 used out of 38,

I switch back to the mains for landing.

I assume each tank may be 4 gals low, just because...
Un-level filling, combustion heater use, whatever.

I set the totalizer to assume only 120 gallons, not 128.

It would be really nice if the aux tanks could be ported somehow into the mains....

As they did with later models.

D
__________________
David Wartofsky
Potomac Airfield
10300 Glen Way
Fort Washington, MD 20744
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 03-11-12, 07:40 PM
Ernie Martin's Avatar
Ernie Martin Ernie Martin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 989
Ernie Martin is an unknown quantity at this point
For clarity, I added a sentence in italics to my March 3 post above.

Ernie
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 09-22-19, 08:10 AM
patrolpilot's Avatar
patrolpilot patrolpilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: South Texas
Posts: 312
patrolpilot is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernie Martin View Post
Here is one source: www.mypilotstore.com/mypilotstore/sep/1177

It's easy to calibrate. I have the FuelHawk shown in the link; the calibration for my 337G with extended range tanks is shown below :

Mark Gallons (Usable)
0 31.8
1 37.8
2 42.7
3 46.1
4 49.4
5 52.5
6 54.8
7 57.0

Ernie
Thank you, Ernie! Proof that there is no such thing as an old topic. I just bought a G, and this was to be the first order of business!

Of course, I will verify the numbers for my airplane but hoped to establish a minimum fuel load for takeoff referenced to the "zero" point that you have measured. That is the only thing about the extended tanks, lack of a visual check, but I'm happy to have the airplane. Too bad that Cessna never engineered a drip stick on the inboard tank. I've used them plenty of times on the airliners I've flown. Probably enough pilot vs. fuel problems to begin with. Why fly if you can't see it?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 09-24-19, 12:52 AM
wslade2 wslade2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: none
Posts: 303
wslade2 is on a distinguished road
I have been looking at CiES fuel sensors and Aerospace Logic display since I got into my plane in March. Have spoken with both CiES and Aerospace Logic. Also Possibly newer Electronics International engine monitor with the CiES sensors. Been slowed down with other maintenance items. Of course always dip the tanks.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 09-25-19, 03:04 PM
patrolpilot's Avatar
patrolpilot patrolpilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: South Texas
Posts: 312
patrolpilot is on a distinguished road
The more I look at them; I'm thinking the Insight Gem 4 Skymaster over the JPI 760. I like the display a lot better. I'm also thinking of the Strike Finder as well. I have the ForeFlight stuff on the iPad, but I love doubling up on information.

I had a WX-10 in my Piper Pacer commuter, it saved my bacon many night.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Unread 10-02-19, 11:05 AM
patrolpilot's Avatar
patrolpilot patrolpilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: South Texas
Posts: 312
patrolpilot is on a distinguished road
I attached the image of measurements I made with my "G" and its long-range tanks. I'm using the J-Hawk J-Air Fuelhawk 11" Universal AvGas Pre-Flight Fuel Dipstick. Also, I sincerely recommend a Fuel Stop - FuelHawk Saver attached to the fuel dipstick. It would be easy to lose the dipstick in any 337 fuel tank.

This was very time consuming work. Each reading was taken with the dipstick resting in the lateral channel that runs down the length of the wing tank. The lowest reading was made with fuel in that channel, directly below the port.

Use the chart at your own risk. Honestly, I will check the accuracy of my recorded data the next time I have the fuel below the filler ports.

The right gauge has stopped working since I bought the airplane. If the problem is in the indicator, I will install the Aerospace Logic FL212 electronic gauge on my aircraft; it is STC'd for the 337.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Dipstick.jpg (14.9 KB, 1292 views)
File Type: jpg FL212.jpg (3.9 KB, 934 views)
File Type: jpg FL212_53704.jpg (62.4 KB, 1826 views)
File Type: jpg fuel stop.jpg (9.6 KB, 1362 views)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 10-02-19, 02:21 PM
wslade2 wslade2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: none
Posts: 303
wslade2 is on a distinguished road
I'm glad you mentioned the insight Gem 4 engine monitor. I think I am going to head for that. I like the vibration analysis capability. My fuel gauge gone so I will likely be doing the aerospace logic fuel indicator with CiES probes after the holidays at the same time. (In the meantime, I still need to squeeze ADS-B out in before end of December.)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 10-16-20, 06:05 PM
Learjetter's Avatar
Learjetter Learjetter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: KOKC
Posts: 244
Learjetter is on a distinguished road
One thing about the Aerospace logic fuel gauge: per the STC it can be the only fuel gauge installed. So any later upgrade to glass engine management or glass navigation will mean the aerospace logic unit comes out (or you don’t hook up fuel to the fancy glass stuff).
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.