Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 08-12-20, 07:44 PM
DrDave DrDave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 115
DrDave is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAG View Post
Hi all,

Bumping an old thread here...

Just got word my front prop is a 'boat anchor' - too much corrosion to overhaul. I am faced with a decision - do I go with new McCauley's, or new MT's? Price is around the same (maybe a small advantage to MT) - but that is not the issue. I want to make the best choice for reliability, damage tolerance, performance and maintenance costs in the future.

Herb has posted some great feedback on the MT's and I am looking for some more views on propeller choices, and why you may choose one over the other.

Thanks in advance.

Jeff
I have a spare front prop and hub with log book that would bolt right on. Part Number: D2AF34C59-AMP. Looks like 250 hours since disassemble, service, assemble, check track, set angles, balance-complete reseal.

Dave

Last edited by DrDave : 08-13-20 at 02:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 08-13-20, 11:37 AM
JAG JAG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 260
JAG is on a distinguished road
Dr. Dave - you have my attention...Potentially a much faster way to get back into the air. MT prop lead times are 8 to 10 weeks!

PM or call me; we can discuss a price.

I still have a decision to make though... the front prop that was removed did not have many hours since overhaul, but a few years for sure. The rear prop has way more hours and years on the aircraft, so based on the reason the front got rejected at overhaul, I am guessing the rear is in the same condition and will be scrap at next overhaul as well. The issue is internal corrosion on hub and on blade roots inside hub. This is due to an aircraft that was sitting and not utilized AND being in south Texas in the humid environment. I had to remove the front prop due to an oil leak, but I am pretty confident that the rear prop is not much further behind in giving me problems. These old props are not supported with parts anymore, and McCauley is pushing the current ones.

I believe it's a case of deciding "when" I buy new props, not "if".

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 09-12-22, 07:52 AM
Learjetter's Avatar
Learjetter Learjetter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: KOKC
Posts: 244
Learjetter is on a distinguished road
MT Service Bulletin #30 (blade lag screws) to be an AD

Information about the MT Prop Service Bulletin SB-30 is posted below in this thread. It seems the FAA has taken EASA's lead and determined the SB needs to be an Airworthiness Directive.

The latest version of the SB can be found on the MT Prop site here

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) plans to issue the following AD effective 16 SEP 2022:
2022-18-02

If the link doesn't work, or you're not enamored with the new FAA Dynamic Regulatory System, I'll attach the proposed AD from the DRS site.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 2022-18-02 MT Prop AD.pdf (650.0 KB, 275 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.