|
No dispute with your removing the messages.
However, I would suggest that at some point, when factually erroneous statements are posted, that are subject to clarification by reference to official public documents, that there needs to be some ability to deal with the truth of the matter.
I don't envy your position in having to deal with that sort of issue.
But surpressing references to public records and crticism pointing out erroneous reports of those records calls for the exercise of some extraordinary wisdom.
My regards, George
|