View Single Post
  #4  
Unread 08-11-04, 01:31 AM
SkyKing SkyKing is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pacific NW - USA
Posts: 413
SkyKing is on a distinguished road
Post 400B vs. S-TEC

Kevin B,

Congrats on N325... thought that airplane would make somebody very pleased. Before you 'discard' the 400B -- which by the way is a WONDERFUL piece of gear when it's properly adjusted -- check around for a reputable outfit to get it synched and working properly. Seems there was an outfit in Oklahoma City that specialised in these.

If you cannot get things straightened away with the 400B, the S-TEC series are definitely STC'd for your paricular model. Not by choice.... but only because it was installed by the previous owner... our 1977 P-model has an S-TEC 50 system with altitude hold installed and it works as advertised and have never had a problem with it.

But again, you're looking at needless expense if you don't shop around for a specialist in the 400B department. It'd be better to get it working that spending all the moola for an S-TEC!\

SkyKing
Reply With Quote