Merged Threads
 

MShac -- good point about the other thread, I should have continued the previous thread. As penance, I merged the two (I hope it worked!)

So, to sum it all up:

Why remove them?
- To reduce the complexity of the fuel system plumbing and keep other twin pilots asking why they're there.
- To remove additional sources of fuel leaks in the engine compartments above the cylinders.
- To eliminate any source of fuel leak from the manual primer system at the pedestal or under the floor.
- To improve the front fuel strainer longevity by reducing the connections to it and reducing the sources of fuel that may contaminate it.
- Gain ~ 2 lbs of useful load.
- Gain additional lower pedestal space for future equipment installation.

Is it safe to remove them?
- My POH does not reference manual primers in any system description nor in any normal or emergency checklist, nor in any "Kinds of Operations". Therefore there is no operating requirement to ever use them. The electric AUX pumps are checked on every engine start and are specifically described as for engine start and to serve inflight as a backup to the engine-driven pump.
- Aircraft's "general" equipment list refers to the primers as (A) meaning "optional equipment items which are in addition to required or standard items"
- Aircraft-specific equipment list has "Engine Priming System" on it, but I would contend that includes AUX pumps vice only the manual primers. In short, the engines require a priming function, but the specific equipment to fulfill that role can be the electric AUX pumps OR the manual primers (my opinion).
- FAA MMEL -- confirmed the manual primers aren't on it.
- 14 CFR 91.213 does not prohibit removal of the manual primers

I think we'll consider removing them with a logbook entry like Bill did.
-LJ